Martin Luther King Jr was also a womanizer…So what!
On last Sunday’s edition of Meet the Press, Newsweek’s Jon Meacham recommended – as a must read for this year - the final volume of Taylor Branch’s biographical trilogy of Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) entitled At Canaan’s Edge. And, having read his first two volumes (and excerpts from this one), I second that recommendation.However, I suspect Meacham recommended Branch's book because of its informative behind-the-scenes account of the political intrigue that beset the Civil Rights Movement (including MLK’s power struggles with upstarts like Jesse Jackson and warrantless wiretaps [No, Bush was not the first to order spying on American citizens] by the FBI seeking information to undermine his moral authority). Whereas, TIME’s editors seem to think that teasing readers with innuendos about MLK’s private life is a more effective way to feature his book....Oh, and to maximize sales of their weekly magazine.
Of course, thanks to former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, we already know almost as much about MLK’s womanizing as we do about JFK’s. Yet I have no doubt that interest in Branch’s fascinating details about the complex and often fractious relationships amongst the leaders of the movement will pale in comparison to interest in the few details he provides about MLK’s relationships with women.
But, since I believe that TIME is exploiting "The Secret Agony” of MLK for patently commercial purposes, I hereby provide a tease that I hope will inflate sales of Branch’s scholarly book but deflate interest in TIME’s trashy story:
His womanizing was the source of such agonizing moral conflict that MLK was compelled to confess his most enduring extramarital affair to his wife at “her most vulnerable moment — days after she recovered from a hysterectomy.”
There! Awful, isn’t it? And we all thought Newt Gingrich was an unconscionable jerk for trying to discuss divorce terms with his wife whilst she was in a hospital bed recovering from surgery for uterine cancer….
Note: The only redeeming feature of TIME’s cover is that - by highlighting this aspect of MLK’s life - it might lead to a cognitive dissonance that disabuses Americans of their naïve and hypocritical regard for marital fidelity. After all, there seems to be such a probative correlation between great leaders and womanizing (think Thomas Jefferson, JFK, Bill Clinton, and even the wanna-be-great, Jesse Jackson) that it behooves us to be more accepting of this “tragic flaw”.
This book is worth the read, despite the sex!
Technorati Tags: MLK, Taylor Branch, At Canaan’s Edge










13 Comments:
Whether or not someone in politics is faithful to their spouse has nothing to do in my opinion with how effective or ineffective they are as a political leader or in any socio economic function. Clinton did a fabulous job while in office in my opinion and that is all that was dwelled upon was an affair towards the end. The Country was thriving, world relations were good. In contrast, women can be and are just as unfaithful nowadays. This does not mean that this same woman cannot be a good physician, lawyer or mother because she has affairs. It is no one's business who is in who's bedroom.
Mary
Amen Mary... I have had about all I can take from the professional talking heads (and those who follow them blindly) as they try to define the moral boundaries. Maybe my view is a bit narrow, but aside from my wife, I really don't care who is sleeping with who.
Rage....
Bravo Mary and Rage....
This is a truly brilliant piece of writing Mr ALH. Though I could never express it so well and in such topical context too, I have long felt this way about the obsession in America about the private lives of their politicians, like that Monica Lewinsky business. Your slamming the profit motives of TIME was also priceless. Well done.
James
it must be so easy for you to sit on your high horse an say the rest of us should get over men who cheat on their wives. but if he can't be trusted to honor his marriage or religious vows then martin luther king is no better than all the other low-lifes who step out on their wives and families. you need to be born again my brother!!!
Religious (Designee) Anonymous Without Signature-
This is what bothers me about ultra religious people in their religious boat. There are other international and national humanitarian topics that should take precedence over this continued foolish controversy of fidelity amongst partners (some people actually have open marriages - who is anyone to judge this situation?) such as eradication of child pornography, female circumsicion (mutiliation of female children's genitilia), poverty and wars. Why not spend some of that energy on these issues and making a difference as opposed to obsession with sexuality between consenting adults and what takes place in the privacy of one's home?
Mary
Anthony, James and Rage, it pleases me to hear other progressives...other kindred spirits cognizant of pertinent issues...sometimes my pseudo-intelllectual friend Amber and I have felt that we were the only community of the sane....and that there was no where we could turn any longer on this planet...
you are a breath of fresh air
Mary
mary
it dont surprise me that men would see nothing wrong about steppin out on their wives but i don't get you girl. i suppose you one of them desperate anything my man wants is fine by me women. i think you need jesus and therapy.
and my name is lisa johnson and i live on los angeles!
Lisa ..I think you gotten the wrong impression about me...First, I am no girl, I am a Woman and I am hardly a little mouse sitting in the corner for a few morsels to chew that my husband will throw at me...to the contrary...I am very liberated and just how do you know that I don't step out on my husband? Or whether or not we have an open marriage? How do you do know that I have not found Jesus? You are rather presumptious and by the way..who made you the designee over how anyone else should live?
Mary...Bay Area
Hi Mary - I told a few of my friends about your comments and how Ms Johnson from Los Angeles responded and we all wondered how we would react. I don't think any of us would have handled her with the class you showed.
Way to go.
Allie
Thank you for your very kind words Allie..I try to take the high road whenever I can ...
Mary
When you get married, you vow to "...forsake all others". If you break that vow, then no, it doesn't make you a bad physician or lawyer. It does, however make you a liar and at the very least someone of questionable character. In terms of public service, it's not about the morality (or lack thereof) of committing adultery. It's about the uncertainty that exists concerning the integrity of a person who betrays the most solemn of vows. Clinton's affair was not what was "dwelled upon". It was the fact that he looked his fellow countrymen in the eye, pointed his finger in their face, and LIED. My argument boils down to this: If you will lie to the one you supposedly care about more than anyone in the world, how could anyone else ever trust you with anything?
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
I've been affected by a person in high power abusing their power anc cheating on their spouse. This behavior affects more people than the leader and they must be careful not to counter their work with these explicit relationships.
So, no, they do need to be held accountable. The act can hurt people, and we can't be narrow minded in thinking that all great people have this "fatal flaw," we, as human beings are better than that.
Thankfully, MLK did a lot of great things in helping the civil rights movement move forward. Also recognize that he didn't do it all alone. and that he succeeded DESPITE his affair, rather than implying he succeeded b/c of his affair or that he couldnt help himself.
Post a Comment
<< Home